The opposed
602km twin humming happily along just in front of your tiny windscreen
requires very little attention. Occasionally, however, you will need to pay attention to the oily goo
that appears at the various engine joints and shaft seals.
The oil astray
is an indicator on a crankcase breather that may no longer
function properly. The crankcase breather is responsible for establishing a sub -
atmospheric pressure in side the crankcase. Like on the moon.
Link to a very good description
of the breather (and an illustration of the breather itself)
A few words on my own experience with the breather:
Dusty did - after 135 000 km - fell a little out of breath. Negotiating
an (upwards) hill involved breaking all sorts of speed limits
at the bottom of it. Without neccesarily risking a speeding ticket at
the top of the hill. Not sensational for a
2CV but still. . . Having a couple of 2CV's makes life a constant
comparison, however. Dusty WAS lagging
behind. We had observed a fair amount of goo around the engine block joints.
And we had purchased a breather at the 2005 world meet in Kelso. May
2006, we replaced the breather and we could hardly recognize the lady,
Dusty became a beast - a hilltop speeding patrol's best income source.
Piloted by Hilde, that is. OK so we know the result. What is the story
here?
Heure d'aller le docteur
de les
Coupe d'un
reniflard
The mythbusting part
involved first attempting to understand how the breather system works.
There are several descriptions on the web referring to testing the
under-pressure by connecting a U -tube to the oil dipstick pipe. And
the idea that the vacuum at idle according to various sources (1,
2)
should be at least 50-60mm water column.
So far so good. Why is the breather such a big deal ?
The 2CV boxer motor - or any 2 cylinder boxer for that sake - is
unique in a few respects - one detail is that the net crankcase volume
will vary by [602 ccm] once per revolution. This rapid volume surging is not present on
a four cylinder engine because on a four banger two pistons will be
exiting the crankcase when two are entering the same. For some of us,
adding two extra pistons just for the sake of constant crankcase volume
seems like a lot of hassle. In lieu of the surplus
pistons Walter Becchia
figured out that a
membrane based valve would offer the required pressure control.
Unless crancase vapor is allowed to exit, it is obvious that
crancase pressure would build up. The net
overpressure on the business side of the pistons will cause
combustion gas leak into the crankcase. It would therefore seem
like the breather system would be challenged as engine wear builds
up. However, with a reasonable valve, the vacuum pump action of the
flat twin should be quite decent.
In order for the hose - in - the - dipstick measurement to
work decently, the
permanent dipstick pipe must not extend to beneath the oil level in the
crankcase. However, it would seem unlikely for a dipstick
pipe NOT to extend below the oil level. In order to
MYTH -BURST the hose - in - the - dipstick theory; does the observed pressure in reality reflect the crankcase pressure, I
made
an oil filler cap with a hose nipple attached to it.
And I tested the setup with plastic hose at the oil stick pipe
Testing pressure
by connecting hose to dipstick tube - 5 cm pressure with new breather
and then from the custom built oil piller cap
Testing pressure by
connecting hose to nipple on oil breather cap - 11 cm pressure with new
breather
Verdict: is that the dipstick pressure
measurement does not reflect the pressure in the crankcase.
And on Lefty, the crankcase pressure with a new breather is 18cm.
(tested on the cap). Lefty has 80,000 km on the odometer.